TechQuest Project Description

TechQuest Project Description

Someone teaching: Myself, developing staff resources for staff training
Someone learning: SmartBoard-equipped classroom teachers at Oak Valley
Subject matter: Smart operation, use, and implementation strategies
Setting: Oak Valley Middle School SmartBoard users

Background:
I am currently teaching 7th and 8th grade social studies at Oak Valley Middle School in the Huron Valley School district. At my school we divide seventh grade up into two teams of four teachers- one for each subject area. Behind our classrooms is a common space where we can send students back to work independently. When I was setting up my classroom for the first time I went back into this shared space and I found what I initially thought was a dry-erase board on legs. When I asked about it I found out that it was a SmartBoard (which I had never heard of). When I asked the three teachers on my team what it was, they explained to me that the school had purchased one for each team as part of an educational grant for the district. The math teacher explained that she used it for a graphing lesson with her students (about one week a year) and the language arts teacher said that she used it for diagramming sentences (one unit).

I started researching what a SmartBoard was and I found a ton of people online talking about how cool this thing was and how it made student-interaction and manipulation both fun and educational. I spoke with my team and asked if I could install the SmartBoard in my room on the condition that I would use it everyday for teaching. For nearly two years now I have been using a SmartBoard in my room and still each week I am discovering new things about it. When my team heard students talking about how cool the board was, they decided that they wanted one too. SmartBoard fever spread rapidly and somehow my administrators were able to acquire approximately fifteen boards for the school. While the materials are now available for many teachers in my school, training is entirely lacking. Everything I know about my SmartBoard has been learned through trial and error and independent exploration. My fellow teachers and I have received no training to date and I know of at least two teachers who have never even plugged in the SmartBoard and use it simply as an over-priced projection screen.


The Educational Need:
The educational need that my TechQuest will focus around is the need for effective teacher training in the basic operation, use, and implementation of SmartBoards in the classroom.

Justification:
While the technology is available, without effective training it becomes increasingly difficult to justify this rather sizable expenditure of funds. If I can develop a training plan for how to help my fellow teachers unlock the full potential of the boards in the classroom then we can become a more confident and informed staff. I believe that, with the appropriate training, we will be able to take the lead in our district in using educational technology in our classrooms. In addition, if the staff understands the tools that they have been given, they will be able to use them more creatively to enhance the learning of our students. While a hammer maybe a wonderful tool, if you don’t know what a nail is or how to use one the hammer is quite useless. With the proper training, I believe that this tool can be used for the crafting of high-quality educational instruction.

The Research:
Between speaking with m interactive whiteboard using colleagues, both within my school and in my SIG, the issue of inadequate or non-existent training is quite prevalent. In a 2009 report by Lois Cavucci (1) the author surveyed teachers about the barriers to implementing technology in their classrooms. From these surveys, two of the top five barriers highlighted by the respondents were a lack of training and lack of time to learn how to implement technology in their instruction. In a case study by Beth Coghlan (2) in 2004, the author identified for commonly noted barriers to technology integration: lack of tools, time, training, and support. Cathy Jones (3) also noted that, in order for teachers to effectively integrate technology in their teaching, they must feel confident and competent in the training and use of the technology. In addition, Jones (4) noted that simply having technology in the classroom does not lead to integration. Teachers need effective training in order for this investment to be effective. Shannon Cole (5) also discusses the widespread purchase and distribution of technology to classroom teachers with the reoccurring issue of teacher training getting in the way of effective use. In “Teacher adoption of interactive whiteboards,” Rosevear (6) notes that in order for interactive whiteboards to be used effectively and be truly integrated into the pedagogical practices of teachers, their must be an investment of time put into meaningful instruction and training.

The Plan:
Before the end of this school year I am planning to develop a face-to-face training tutorial and a supplemental electronic resource for the staff at my middle school. My tutorial will cover basic operation of the board, beginner strategies for incorporation of the board into daily classroom practices, and how to develop interactive resources using the Smart Notebook software. I am going to propose this to my administrator once I have the basic setup ready with the intention of some release time to provide hands-on training for the staff.



Resources:
1. Cavucci, L.. An analysis of barriers and possible solutions in integrating computer technology into middle school curriculum: Findings from a mixed-method approach. Ed.D. dissertation, Youngstown State University, United States -- Ohio. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3357290).

2. Coghlan, Beth Ferguson (2004). Addressing the barriers to technology integration: A case study of a rural school. Ph.D. dissertation, Mississippi State University, United States -- Mississippi. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3122177).

3. Jones, Cathy Areu. (2001, October). When teachers' computer literacy doesn't go far enough. The Education Digest, 67(2), 57-61. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Research Library Core. (Document ID: 82213210).

4. Jones, Cathy Areu. (2001, May). Tech support: Preparing teachers to use technology. Principal Leadership, 1(9), 35-39. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Education Module. (Document ID: 73997752).

5. Cole, Shannon L. (2000). Technology has found its way into our schools...now what? TechTrends, 44(6), 23. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Sciences Module. (Document ID: 65223254).

6. Rosevear, J.. Teacher adoption of interactive whiteboards: A case study. Ed.D. dissertation, George Fox University, United States -- Oregon. Retrieved April 6, 2010, from Dissertations & Theses: A&I.(Publication No. AAT 3388209).